|
|
books
| book details |
Imaginative Moods: Aesthetics, Religion, Philosophy
By (author) Dorthe Jørgensen
|
| on special |
normal price: R 984.95
Price: R 885.95
|
| book description |
Following modern and postmodern philosophy’s critique of metaphysics, experiences of transcendence are often considered ‘aesthetic’ rather than ‘metaphysical.’ However, aesthetics is mostly identified with the study of art, and aesthetic phenomena are considered particularly sensuous. This book criticizes such an approach to aesthetics, which has led many philosophers and theologians to neglect or reject aesthetics as a philosophical or theological discipline. It demonstrates how contemporary philosophy and theology may benefit from studying the mind-opening and world-transformative nature of our experiences of transcendence. In addition, it presents the significance of such experiences for the understanding of, for example, art, faith, prayer, presence, beauty, sensitivity, imagination, receptivity, and divinity. Imaginative Moods: Aesthetics, Religion, Philosophy is related to the simultaneously published monograph Poetic Inclinations: Ethics, History, Philosophy. Together they constitute a comprehensive presentation in English of the author’s philosophy of experience, which includes new ways of conceiving of and applying aesthetics, hermeneutics, and phenomenology, and of integrating these disciplines, as well as theology.
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Aarhus University Press
Published date | 5 Jun 2021
Language |
Format | Hardback
Pages | 236
Dimensions | 240 x 160 x 0mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 0g
ISBN | 978-8-7721-9105-8
Readership Age |
BISAC | philosophy / history & surveys / modern
| other options |
Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 1 480.95
Price | R 1 332.95
| on special |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
|
Matt Dinniman
Paperback / softback
480 pages
was: R 522.95
now: R 459.95
|
|
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
