|
|
books
| book details |
EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty before National Courts: The Case of the Habitats Directive
Edited by Mariolina Eliantonio, Edited by Emma Lees, Edited by Tiina Paloniitty
|
| on special |
normal price: R 4 370.95
Price: R 3 933.95
|
| book description |
This comparative book explores the dynamics driving how courts across Europe and beyond understand and analyse scientific information in nature conservation. The Habitats and the Birds Directives—the core of EU nature conservation law—are usually seen as the most ‘uniform’ parts of EU environmental law. This book analyses the case law from 11 current and former EU Member States’ courts and explores the dynamics of how, and crucially why, their understandings of scientific uncertainty on the one hand, and EU environmental principles on the other, vary. The courts’ scope and depth of review, access to scientific knowledge, and scientific literacy all influence such decisions—as does their interpretation of norms and principles. How have the courts evaluated scientific evidence, encompassing its essential uncertainties? This book answers this and many more questions pertinent to EU environmental law, comparative environmental law, administrative law, and STS studies. Co-edited by experienced leaders in the field, and with outstanding contributors, this book is an essential guide to the dynamics of nature conservation law.
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
Published date | 20 Apr 2023
Language |
Format | Hardback
Pages | 424
Dimensions | 236 x 154 x 28mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 760g
ISBN | 978-1-5099-4819-2
Readership Age |
BISAC | law / international
| other options |
Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 5 239.95
Price | R 4 715.95
| on special |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
Matt Dinniman
Paperback / softback
480 pages
was: R 523.95
now: R 461.95
|
|
|
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
