|
|
|
books
| book details |
What is Wrong with Human Trafficking?: Critical Perspectives on the Law
Edited by Professor Rita Haverkamp, Edited by Ester Herlin-Karnell, Edited by Professor Claes Lernestedt
|
| on special |
normal price: R 2 476.95
Price: R 2 352.95
|
| book description |
The overarching objective of this volume is to discuss and critique the legal regulation of human trafficking in national and transnational context. Specifically, discussion is needed not only with regard to the historical and philosophical points of departure for any criminalisation of trafficking, but also, regarding the societal and social framework, the empirical dimension such as existing statistics in the area, and the need for more data. The book combines descriptive and normative analyses of the crime of trafficking in human beings from a cross-legal perspective. Notwithstanding the enhanced interest for human trafficking in politics, the public and the media, a critical perspective such as the one pursued herewith has so far been largely absent. Against this background, this approach allows for theoretical findings to be addressed by pointing out and elaborating different, interdisciplinary conflicts and inconsistencies in the regulation of human trafficking. The book discusses the phenomenon of human trafficking critically from various angles, giving it ‘shape’ and showing how it comes to life in the legal regulation.
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
Published date | 24 Sep 2020
Language |
Format | Paperback / softback
Pages | 280
Dimensions | 242 x 168 x 18mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 480g
ISBN | 978-1-5099-4527-6
Readership Age |
BISAC | law / criminal law
| other options |
|
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
Mason Coile
Paperback / softback
224 pages
was: R 520.95
now: R 468.95
|
A terrifying locked-room mystery set in a remote outpost on Mars.
|
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
|
