|
|
books
| book details |
To Kill Another: Homicide and Natural Law
By (author) Graham McAleer
|
| on special |
normal price: R 6 691.95
Price: R 6 022.95
|
| book description |
Basing his argument on natural law, Graham J. McAleer asserts that only public authority has the right to intentionally kill. He draws upon the work of Thomas Aquinas and Francisco de Vitoria, defending the claim that these natural law theorists have developed the best available theory of homicide. To have rule of law in any meaningful sense, the author argues, there must be protections for the guilty and prohibition against killing innocents. Western theories of law have drifted steadily towards the privatization of homicide,despite the fact that it runs counter to rule of law. Public acts of homicide like capital punishment are now viewed by many as barbaric, while a private act of homicide like the starvation of comatose patients is viewed by many as a caring gesture both to patient and family. This subversion of the rule of law is prompted by humanitarian ethics. McAleer argues that humanitarianism is a false friend to those committed to the rule of law. The problem of human vulnerability makes political theology an inescapable consideration for law. Readers will find much to reflect upon in this book. McAleer's argument can be read as a cultural chapter in the history of moral ideas, but also as a close and timely reading of a grim subject.
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd
Published date | 20 Sep 2017
Language |
Format | Hardback
Pages | 252
Dimensions | 229 x 152 x 0mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 453g
ISBN | 978-1-1385-3971-6
Readership Age |
BISAC | law / legal history
| other options |
Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 7 859.95
Price | R 7 073.95
| on special |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
|
Matt Dinniman
Paperback / softback
480 pages
was: R 523.95
now: R 461.95
|
|
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
