|
|
books
| book details |
Polarizing Development: Alternatives to Neoliberalism and the Crisis
Edited by Lucia Pradella, Edited by Thomas Marois
|
| on special |
normal price: R 1 406.95
Price: R 1 265.95
|
| book description |
The global economic crisis has exposed the limits of neoliberalism and dramatically deepened social polarization. Yet, despite increasing social resistance and opposition, neoliberalism prevails globally. Radical alternatives, moreover, are only rarely debated. And if they are, such alternatives are reduced to new Keynesian and new developmental agendas, which fail to address existing class divisions and imperialist relations of domination. This collection of essays polarizes the debate between radical and reformist alternatives by exploring head-on the antagonistic structure of capitalist development. The contributors ground their proposals in an international, non-Eurocentric and Marxian inspired analysis of capitalism and its crises. From Latin America to Asia, Africa to the Middle East and Europe to the US, social and labour movements have emerged as the protagonists behind creating alternatives. This book's new generation of scholars has written accessible yet theoretically informed and empirically rich chapters elaborating radical worldwide strategies for moving beyond neoliberalism, and beyond capitalism. The intent is to provoke critical reflection and positive action towards substantive change.
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Pluto Press
Published date | 20 Nov 2014
Language |
Format | Paperback / softback
Pages | 288
Dimensions | 230 x 150 x 0mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 432g
ISBN | 978-0-7453-3469-1
Readership Age |
BISAC | science / general
| other options |
Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 1 636.95
Price | R 1 473.95
| on special |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
|
Matt Dinniman
Paperback / softback
480 pages
was: R 522.95
now: R 459.95
|
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
|
