|
|
books
| book details |
Fashioning Intellectual Property: Exhibition, Advertising and the Press, 1789–1918
By (author) Megan Richardson, By (author) Julian Thomas
|
| on special |
normal price: R 1 610.95
Price: R 1 449.95
|
| book description |
Vigorous public debate about intellectual property has a long history. In this assessment of the shifting relationships between the law and the economic, social and cultural sources of creativity and innovation during the long-nineteenth century, Megan Richardson and Julian Thomas examine the 'fashioning' of the law by focusing on emblematic cases, key legislative changes and broader debates. Along the way, the authors highlight how, in 'the age of journalism', the press shaped, and was shaped by, the idea of intellectual property as a protective crucible for improvements in knowledge and progress in the arts and sciences. The engagement in our own time between intellectual property and the creative industries remains volatile and unsettled. As the authors conclude, the fresh opportunities for artistic diversity, expression and communication offered by new media could see the place of intellectual property in the scheme of law being reinvented once again.
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press
Published date | 19 Jan 2012
Language |
Format | Hardback
Pages | 204
Dimensions | 235 x 155 x 18mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 460g
ISBN | 978-0-5217-6756-9
Readership Age |
BISAC | law / intellectual property
| other options |
Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 3 006.95
Price | R 2 705.95
| on special |
Out of Print / Publication Cancelled
Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 3 377.95
Price | R 3 039.95
| on special |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
|
|
Mason Coile
Paperback / softback
224 pages
was: R 522.95
now: R 470.95
|
A terrifying locked-room mystery set in a remote outpost on Mars.
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
