|
|
books
| book details |
Seeds of Disaster, Roots of Response: How Private Action Can Reduce Public Vulnerability
Edited by Philip E. Auerswald, Edited by Lewis M. Branscomb, Edited by Todd M. La Porte, Edited by Erwann O. Michel-Kerjan
|
| on special |
normal price: R 2 037.95
Price: R 1 834.95
|
| book description |
In the wake of 9/11 and hurricane Katrina, executives and policymakers are increasingly motivated to reduce the vulnerability of social and economic systems to disasters. Most prior work on 'critical infrastructure protection' has focused on the responsibilities and actions of government rather than on those of the private sector firms that provide most vital services. Seeds of Disaster, Roots of Response is the first systematic attempt to understand how private decisions and operations affect public vulnerability. It describes effective and sustainable approaches - both business strategies and public policies - to ensure provision of critical services in the event of disaster. The authors are business leaders from multiple industries and are experts in risk analysis, economics, engineering, organization theory and public policy. The book shows the necessity of deeply rooted collaboration between private and public institutions, and the accountability and leadership required to progress from words to action.
| product details |

Normally shipped |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press
Published date | 18 Sep 2006
Language |
Format | Paperback / softback
Pages | 576
Dimensions | 235 x 155 x 27mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 783g
ISBN | 978-0-5216-8572-6
Readership Age |
BISAC | social science / sociology / general
| other options |

Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 2 287.95
Price | R 2 058.95
| on special |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
Mason Coile
Paperback / softback
224 pages
was: R 520.95
now: R 468.95
|
A terrifying locked-room mystery set in a remote outpost on Mars.
|
|
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|