|
|
books
| book details |
The Transformation Of The Supreme Court's Agenda: From The New Deal To The Reagan Administration
By (author) Richard Pacelle
|
| on special |
normal price: R 1 942.95
Price: R 1 747.95
|
| book description |
When we think of judicial activism–the Court's role in making public policy–we often focus on individuals: the Robert Borks or Thurgood Marshalls of the times. In this book, Richard Pacelle explores the institutional judicial activism of the Supreme Court through the dramatic changes in its agenda as it has evolved from 1933 to the present. Once dominated by economic issues, the Supreme Court's agenda is now populated largely by cases involving individual rights and liberties. This shift is hardly accidental, Pacelle argues, and he offers quantitative as well as qualitative assessments of the means and motivations for change. Over 7,500 cases serve as the basis of analysis, and the narrative is amplified by informative appendixes: an explanation of the author's case taxonomy, a chronology of the Court's chief justices, a list of cases cited, and a digest of key cases. The systematic framework provided for tracing historical changes in the Supreme Court's agenda is the first of its kind and is sure to be valuable in future analyses and projections of coming change beyond the Rehnquist Court.
| product details |

Normally shipped |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd
Published date | 9 Nov 2020
Language |
Format | Paperback / softback
Pages | 264
Dimensions | 237 x 148 x 0mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 520g
ISBN | 978-0-3673-1214-5
Readership Age |
BISAC | political science / general
| other options |

Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 2 321.95
Price | R 2 089.95
| on special |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
|
Mason Coile
Paperback / softback
224 pages
was: R 517.95
now: R 465.95
|
A terrifying locked-room mystery set in a remote outpost on Mars.
|
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|