|
|
books
| book details |
The Podium, the Pulpit, and the Republicans: How Presidential Candidates Use Religious Language in American Political Debate
By (author) Frederick Stecker, Foreword by Charles C. Lemert
|
| on special |
normal price: R 2 519.95
Price: R 2 393.95
|
| book description |
In this book, the presidential debates of 2000, 2004, and 2008 are analyzed in terms of linguistics, rhetoric, and religious context to offer a unique perspective on the styles, beliefs, and strategies of the two major parties and their candidates. In The Podium, the Pulpit, and the Republicans: How Presidential Candidates Use Religious Language in American Political Debate, a veteran minister analyzes the religious metaphors Republicans use at the podium and alleges that the party deliberately employs blaming tactics, fear metaphors, and coded references to apocalyptic judgment to sway undecided voters. Over the past 40 years, Frederick Stecker charges, the Republican Party has created fear for political expediency. Stecker's book traces the development of the Republican rhetoric of polarization and applies the linguistics-based ""nation-as-a-family"" political typology of George Lakoff to an analysis of the presidential debates of 2000, 2004, and 2008. He demonstrates how Republican candidates select their language and metaphors to signal adherence to rigid belief systems and simple, black-and-white choices in domestic and foreign policy.
| product details |

Normally shipped |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
Published date | 22 Jul 2011
Language |
Format | Hardback
Pages | 256
Dimensions | 235 x 156 x 0mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 567g
ISBN | 978-0-3133-8250-5
Readership Age |
BISAC | political science / political process / elections
| other options |
|
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
Mason Coile
Paperback / softback
224 pages
was: R 542.95
now: R 488.95
|
A terrifying locked-room mystery set in a remote outpost on Mars.
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
|
|